In the Florida gubernatorial race, Democratic candidate David Jolly has called for a statewide one-year moratorium on data center construction, branding Republican opponent Byron Donalds as ‘Data Center Donalds’ over rising grid strain and water depletion fears.
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — The rapid influx of artificial intelligence data centers across the Sunshine State has ignited a fierce political dispute in the Florida gubernatorial race, as Democratic nominee David Jolly launched a high-profile offensive against Republican nominee and U.S. Representative Byron Donalds over commercial power consumption and escalating residential utility bills.
Campaigning across Central Florida, Jolly labeled his Republican rival Data Center Donalds, arguing that Donalds’ full-throated endorsement of hyper-scale computing installations threatens to overwhelm Florida's electrical transmission networks and deplete precious freshwater reserves drawn from the Floridan Aquifer.
As the center of his energy platform, Jolly proposed a mandatory one-year statewide moratorium on the approval and construction of new large-scale data centers. The pause, Jolly argued, is essential to allow state utility regulators and the Florida Public Service Commission (PSC) to assess cumulative grid demands and enact safeguards preventing utility giants like Florida Power & Light (FPL) and Duke Energy from passing transmission expansion costs onto residential ratepayers.
Everyday Floridians are already confronting historic property insurance premiums and punishing monthly electricity bills, Jolly said during an appearance in Orlando. Now, corporate tech giants want to plug massive, power-hungry server warehouses into our public grid while corporate-backed politicians look the other way. Florida needs a temporary pause to establish clear rules: tech billionaires must pay their own way and build their own energy sources rather than forcing Florida families to subsidize their profits.
Jolly’s platform would also mandate strict environmental reviews regarding industrial water usage, pointing out that evaporative cooling systems for mega-watt computing clusters can consume millions of gallons of potable water daily, risking saltwater intrusion in fragile coastal aquifers.
Congressman Byron Donalds forcefully rejected the criticism, dismissing the moniker as a partisan distraction and framing data center infrastructure as vital to Florida’s future economic independence and technological leadership. Donalds contended that enacting bans or moratoria would drive high-paying engineering, cybersecurity, and electrical infrastructure investments to competing Southeastern states like Georgia and North Carolina.
Artificial intelligence, high-performance computing, and advanced digital networks are the engines of the 21st-century economy and national security, Donalds said in response. A moratorium is backward-looking policy that tells innovators and job creators that Florida is closed for business. What Florida needs is visionary energy expansion, not artificial scarcity.
Donalds has advocated for a market-driven energy transition that incorporates next-generation clean power solutions, including co-locating small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) directly alongside data industrial parks and requiring closed-loop greywater filtration systems to eliminate impacts on local drinking water supplies.
The conflict highlights how emerging technological infrastructure has become an urgent retail campaign issue across Florida. With regional economic development councils actively courting billion-dollar digital campus investments in rural counties like Osceola, Polk, and St. Lucie, voters in November will decide whether the state pursues rapid digital industrialization or imposes precautionary regulatory guardrails on grid development.
Energy analysts in Florida point out that the state’s geographic vulnerability to severe tropical hurricanes adds unique complexity to grid reliability calculations. As data centers demand uninterrupted, 24/7 power availability during extreme weather events, the debate over who shoulders the capital expenditure for grid hardening, undergrounding power lines, and maintaining emergency fuel reserves is destined to intensify heading into the autumn debates.
ICBC, the Conservative $1,000 tax cut, the NDP top-earner tax and a dropped candidate dominated the BC election conversation this week. Here is what each fight is about.

B.C. votes Oct. 24 in a snap election. Why choosing carefully matters in a democracy, and where to find each party's positions and what voters say on both sides.

What voters say they like about Premier David Eby and the BC NDP ahead of Oct. 24: housing, health care, cost of living and keeping the Conservatives out.
