The influential Iowa Farm Bureau PAC has declined to endorse either Republican nominee Zach Lahn or Democratic State Auditor Rob Sand, preserving organizational neutrality in Iowa's closely watched open-seat gubernatorial contest.
DES MOINES, Iowa — In a striking departure from historical precedent in Hawkeye State politics, the political arm of the Iowa Farm Bureau Federation has formally withheld an endorsement in the 2026 race for governor, declining to back either major-party candidate in the open contest to succeed retiring Governor Kim Reynolds.
The Iowa Farm Bureau Political Action Committee (PAC) unveiled its comprehensive slate of state and federal endorsements this week, throwing its considerable organizational support behind incumbent federal lawmakers, including Representative Ashley Hinson, and statewide agricultural officials like Secretary of Agriculture Mike Naig. However, the committee conspicuously omitted the gubernatorial contest, leaving both Republican nominee Zach Lahn and Democratic nominee Rob Sand without the backing of Iowa's premier agricultural lobby.
The decision to remain neutral underscores the delicate political and economic crosscurrents confronting Iowa's farm economy. Governor Reynolds, who announced earlier this year that she would not seek a third full executive term, enjoyed deep, consistent support from the Farm Bureau throughout her tenure, partnering with the organization on biofuel mandates, rural property tax restructuring, and agricultural conservation initiatives. Her departure created an open seat that has drawn intense national scrutiny and shifting race ratings.
Agricultural policy strategists note that the Farm Bureau's silence reflects divergent anxieties within the state's farming community. Republican nominee Zach Lahn, a conservative entrepreneur who secured the GOP nomination with strong backing from grassroots activists, has championed broad state income tax phase-outs and regulatory deregulation. However, some traditional farm leaders have expressed apprehension over proposed shifts in agricultural property valuation methods and national trade tariff rhetoric that could trigger retaliatory duties on Iowa soybean and corn exports.
Conversely, Democratic nominee Rob Sand—currently serving as Iowa State Auditor and the state's sole Democratic statewide elected official—has conducted extensive outreach in rural counties, pitching fiscal transparency, rural hospital preservation, and strict enforcement of grain warehouse indemnity protections. Sand has actively criticized industrial carbon capture pipeline land acquisitions via eminent domain, an issue that has deeply divided rural property owners and agribusiness conglomerates across northern and central Iowa.
In a statement accompanying the endorsement roster, Farm Bureau leadership reaffirmed that their PAC evaluations are grounded strictly on policy alignment with grassroots farm policy, rather than party affiliation. The organization emphasized that candidate recommendations are formulated following localized input from county-level Farm Bureau voting delegates across all 99 Iowa counties.
Political observers emphasize that an unendorsed gubernatorial contest deprives the eventual victor of an early, unified grassroots mobilization network that historically deploys thousands of precinct-level agricultural volunteers and targeted voter guides. As both the Lahn and Sand campaigns recalibrate their rural messaging ahead of the November election, the Farm Bureau's neutral posture ensures that agricultural policy, water quality standards, and rural infrastructure investments will remain central battlegrounds down the homestretch.
ICBC, the Conservative $1,000 tax cut, the NDP top-earner tax and a dropped candidate dominated the BC election conversation this week. Here is what each fight is about.

B.C. votes Oct. 24 in a snap election. Why choosing carefully matters in a democracy, and where to find each party's positions and what voters say on both sides.

What voters say they like about Premier David Eby and the BC NDP ahead of Oct. 24: housing, health care, cost of living and keeping the Conservatives out.
